Got a Tip?
tips at gothamist
About Gothamist

Gothamist is a website about New York. More

Editor: Jen Chung Publisher: Jake Dobkin

About Us & Advertising | Archives | Contact | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Favorites
Newsmap
Contribute

Latest tip:

2 people were hit by a car outside of enid's in greenpoint last night. does anyone have any more [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Gothamist.

All Our RSS

January 17, 2007

No Green Light (Yet?) for 980 Madison Ave.

980%20Madison%20Ave.jpgThe Landmarks Preservation Commission yesterday stalled Aby Rosen and Norman Foster’s proposed glass tower above the 1949 Parke-Bernet building at 980 Madison Avenue. While the commission didn’t formally reject the plan, it did not approve the addition or support a zoning waiver, two requirements for the project to proceed. All but one commissioner said during the public meeting at the Surrogate’s Court building that they could not support the building because of its scale, massing, materials and location.

Kudos to the Village Voice for posting the first story online. Felix Gillette reported that Commissioner Joan Gerner called the design “an architectural masterpiece” that “belongs on a vacant site,” rather than atop an existing building in the Upper East Side Historic District. Another, Commissioner Thomas Pike, criticized Foster for inadequately harmonizing glass and limestone (“I’m an authority on marriages. And this marriage makes me nervous” is what Pike, a minister, said). Tom Wolfe wore a black-and-white checkered suit and lime green tie. Perhaps all this attention has motivated him to rethink his look?

The NY Observer was next, running a story culled from a phoner with “principal actors.” Nine of ten commissioners (the 11th was absent, per the NY Times) strongly opposed the plan, wrote Matthew Schuerman, who quote Aby Rosen’s spokesperson as saying the hearing “went quite well,” given that “[n]obody was closing the door and saying, ‘Absolutely not. You can’t build something on top of the Parke-Bernet building.’” Rosen’s coming back with a revised plan.

The NY Times’ write-up is the most thorough and detailed – it even describes Wolfe’s suit as being “navy-and-white houndstooth flannel.” It quotes chairman Robert Tierney’s recommendation to Rosen and Foster at the end of the public meeting: “We will ask you to rethink, restudy, in light of everything that’s been said, and revisit this at some point down the line.”

Rosen told the Times' Sewall Chan that he would study the size of the building and Foster told Chan that, “To be an architect, you have to be an optimist.” Foster had spent the early part of the meeting defending the design, especially the slim tower contrasted against the original, horizontal base of the gallery building and his adjustment of the building’s color from silver to bronze. He was unapologetic over the combination of glass and steel of the new tower and the stone of older buildings nearby, citing recent additions to MoMA and the Morgan Library.

The commissioner who supported the addition was Jan Hird Pokorny, an architect, who said that a vertical tower on or near a horizontal base “has been done in history many times” – and then handed out a German print depicting the Leaning Power of Pisa, begun in 1173, next to the Dome of Pisa, started 100 years earlier!

Wolfe told the Times that he was “surprised and relieved” that the commissioners “showed some backbone.”

Huzzah!

Photograph of Norman Foster and Aby Rosen when they presented the design last October

56

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Gothamist Continues Below!

Comments (4)

It's a beautiful building. I hope it gets built somewhere.

 

This from ArtsJournal.com

"The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission resoundingly rejected a proposal yesterday to build a 30-story glass tower designed by Norman Foster atop a 1949 building on Madison Avenue. The decision was a major victory for a coalition of Upper East Side residents who argued that the tower would rend the fabric of their historic neighborhood."

Now, how come when it comes to Brooklyn and the Atlantic Yards, which affects multiple neiborhoods, was it so easy for that to go up, but not this one building in one neighborhood?

 

"Now, how come when it comes to Brooklyn and the Atlantic Yards, which affects multiple neiborhoods, was it so easy for that to go up, but not this one building in one neighborhood?"

I'd imagine one big difference is that the Foster tower is going on top of an existing ("historic") building, whereas AY is going on top of empty railyards.

 

Except that it's not. The entire master plan includes eminent domain, which means that they are taking up land where people currently live. There are actually buildings, few but some, that in the wake of the planning of AY, that tried to get landmarked, but were unsuccesful, which probably made it easier to approve the project in the end. But, had they been landmarked, that would have been very different...

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.