The Straphangers release their
annual report of subway cleanliness and the good news is that the subways are a little bit cleaner, improving to 66% of subway cars being clean from last year's 59%. However, cleanliness is not that high a bar, as the Straphanger's Gene Russianoff says "a 'moderately clean' car can have a dingy floor with one or two sticky dry spots." Thus he also calls New York City Transit's 80% "moderately clean" goal a "low level of performance" and would the city to aim for 95% of cars to " have either no or 'light' interior dirt." Some other findings:

The percentage of clean cars has more than doubled since 1999-2000.
Cars on ten subway lines saw significant improvement since last year's survey (3, 4, 5, 6, B, C, D, J/Z, Q and R), while cars on only three lines grew worse (7, G, and W). Cars on the remaining nine lines were largely unchanged (1/9, 2, A, E, F, L, M, N and V).
The worst performing line was the C, which had the smallest number of clean cars at 48%. The C also performed worst in last year's survey, although its performance improved from 31% last year to 48% in this survey. The best performing lines were the 3 and 5, with 89% of those cars rated clean. (See table two.)
One C-train rider
tells the Post, "These trains are always dirty. It's really hard to get a seat sometimes because everything is so sticky." And another C-train rider
told the Times she "seen everything from doors smudged with dog feces to seats soiled by spilled milkshakes," but added, "But the worst is a dirty pole. I can do without a seat, but when it's crowded and the train is rocking, I need something to hold onto." Word up...and how did she know it was dog feces, and not some other kind of feces?
Of course the IRT seems cleaner since it switched from the junky old Redbirds to the new computerized-voice trains!
These statistics are somewhat misleading. The clean-car improvements coincide with the lines that just got new trains. The dirtiest lines simply have the oldest cars. I'm sure the new slick trains will be just as filthy after 20 years.
I agree, the stats are misleading, but since the N train (or was it R) was a runner-up in clean cars, I do think there's room for the older cars to improve. And the A/C/E are simply atrocious. Even the old Redbird 2/3s were better kept.
the A/C/E is awful. i've been on it several times where the high school kids are eating mcdonalds and just dump garbage on the floor. i saw one kid wait for the door to crush the soda cup on the A train in upper manhattan. it's not new cars that make the difference.. it's how much the riders act like animals. the 7 train with its ancient cars is 10 times cleaner than A,C,E,B,D